Lol i know you are good in scripting that what i said you should know about the fact what i meant ok i dont want any fight so i will tell you what i meant i was trying to tell him that the array he declared has 3 character and he set size as 3 but if count from 0 and including null terminator the value should be 4 not 3 so count from 0 1 2 3
that means array need one more indice to store the character and null terminator i know its not good way to explain things because im like this
Im not acting smart idk why you saying it like that i was just trying to help him and he started to insult me and you put oil in that...Its actually the thing you dont understand and kept on acting very smart and you reply to every post like this and you actually have no idea what you are talking about and just kept on talking how this is related to this error everyone even konstantinos and one guy who posted after op's post understood what im saying its just you and Ali.I have request being smart is good but being over smart is not good.
these are basics that a programmer should know about these are things that we learn in high school and these are the things that even young programmer know if he doesnt know about what he doing then there is no point of doing and i thought he was pro enough to understand about array indices but finally i understood he didnt and you didnt care to take a look and just started to bargain i explained that.Your reply on that thread made me feel like you are a 12 year old kid who cant understand anthing
When we declare an array :
a is actually storing the memory address of the first element of the array. The first element's value can be accessed via
If we want to access the second elemnt we increment by one step
Inside the compiler, a and *(a+1) are equivalent. So we see, if we start counting the array indices from 0, we can easily access the elements. If instead we were to start counting from 1 then to access the 1st element we would have to do
as the location of the first element is a itself. It will require an additional subtraction.
And of course its related to that error
Well, with it going on for a few months and proof of hosted tab being mirrored on the list I don't see why it can't be that. Kalcor or any of the staff members haven't said anything about it, which really triggers the light.