Server using sarp script + proof

[EpicRoleplay]

Originally Posted by SA-MPDrifter

This isn't a valid accusation, you only have proof of him saying such a thing, not visual proof. Plus, this would only be taken seriously if it was an NGRP script, so just drop it.

Wrong...NGRP was blacklisted...so SAMP can blacklist your server for using it.

[carz0159]

Lol, this is a stupid thread. Also, that's not really proof b/c. You could have went on ur own server as yellow and said that crap. Also, no one cares that they're using a sarp script. They don't care what script u use anymore. Also, blacklisting won't help. They'll just switch ipswich. This is a useless fight.

[admantis]

so i readed this thread
and reached a conclusion

[[GF]Logic]

Greetings San1 Well after all SARP is a leaked game mode back to NGRP and other game modes Now sa-mp team no longer cares for servers using edits and if you want some more information please go here

http://forum.sa-mp.com/showthread.php?t=351357 that's all

Regards Vedo ,

[SuperViper]

Using a leaked script is a complement to the original person who made it. Nuff said.

/thread

[Y_Less]

I have a good mind to warn half of the people in this topic! If you don't think a post should be posted - REPORT it, DON'T reply! If, however, you want to discuss the issue at hand then you can post. Members discuss posts, moderators deal with problems!

Seems to me that you merged with a server, lost your admin, and are now complaining. You even said that their use of this script wouldn't have been a problem had you kept admin, so why should it suddenly become an issue just because of something entirely unrelated? It doesn't.

Originally Posted by SA-MPDrifter

Typically, a work must meet minimal standards of originality in order to qualify for copyright, and the copyright expires after a set period of time (some jurisdictions may allow this to be extended).

Not everything you create can be qualified as copyright, especially a script made by someone who isn't affiliated with any company or well known. Also the Data Protection Act doesn't cover this either:

1. Data must be kept secure;
2. Data stored must be relevant;
3. Data stored must be kept no longer than necessary;
4. Data stored must be kept accurate and up-to-date;
5. Data must be obtained and processed lawfully;
6. Data must be processed within the data subject rights;
7. Data must be obtained and specified for lawful purposes;
8. Data must not be transferred to countries withoutadequate data protection laws

I used to have another account with 500+ posts and over 100 reputation, I think that is considerably better than yours, plus it was created in February, which is after yours was created.

This is so unbelievably wrong! To the best of my knowledge, the only place where making something doesn't immediately qualify it for copyright is when it is made by the American federal government - even then they technically have copyright options but wave them all and place all government produced media in the public domain.