[Plugin] sscanf 2.8.1 - Updated 12/03/13: Now supports npcmodes!

[[Nikk]]

This sscanf of the topic is for samp 0.3d R1 or R2 ?

[robanswe]

Originally Posted by [Nikk]

This sscanf of the topic is for samp 0.3d R1 or R2 ?

Read the first post lazy ******.

[[Nikk]]

From where i can get for samp 0.3 r1 ?

[robanswe]

Originally Posted by [Nikk]

From where i can get for samp 0.3 r1 ?

.............In the first post.............Why do you think I told you to read it even if you should had already done so. I will not give you an link to it if you are to lazy to find it yourself in the first post then you shouldn't be using sscanf at all.

[[Nikk]]

Originally Posted by robanswe

.............In the first post.............Why do you think I told you to read it even if you should had already done so. I will not give you an link to it if you are to lazy to find it yourself in the first post then you shouldn't be using sscanf at all.

Stupid,

In the first post:

Update 6

sscanf for 0.3dR2 (500 and 800 player versions):

http://www.mediafire.com/?bfp2h0d4231jjdr

Thanks to dnee`THA.

meabe you can read before say something

[Y_Less]

Originally Posted by Kyosaur

I think "@" would make a good specifier for this since its pretty much a public function call. It looks good, and can be justified since "@" can serve as an alternative for public function declarations :P.

I *really* like the "@" idea! Well done!

Originally Posted by Kyosaur

If you're adding these custom specifiers, are you planning only supporting integer return values? If not maybe something closer to this would be more desirable:

It doesn't actually matter, because PAWN is typeless and only has tags, you can return anything you like (Floats, ints, other) as long as they're a single cell. You may have to do this to trick the system, but it will work:

SSCANF:func(string[])
{
    new Float:ret = 9.9;
    return _:ret;
}

main()
{
    new Float:x;
    sscanf("anything", "@<func>", x);
}

That should however work fine.

[leong124]

Originally Posted by [Nikk]

Stupid,

In the first post:



meabe you can read before say something

It has backward compatibility to 0.3d R1. Have a try.

[Kyosaur]

Originally Posted by Y_Less

I *really* like the "@" idea! Well done!



It doesn't actually matter, because PAWN is typeless and only has tags, you can return anything you like (Floats, ints, other) as long as they're a single cell. You may have to do this to trick the system, but it will work:

SSCANF:func(string[])
{
    new Float:ret = 9.9;
    return _:ret;
}

main()
{
    new Float:x;
    sscanf("anything", "@<func>", x);
}

That should however work fine.

I'm glad you liked the idea . Now that im well rested i cant remember why i suggested adding return types. Either i've spent to much time in well typed languages, or i was thinking from the implementation side (amx_FindPublic, pushing args, amx_Exec, and then amx_ctof must've come to mind). Either way it was silly of me, especially when we're talking about public functions, sorry about that :P.

If you have anymore cool ideas, im all ears .

[robanswe]

Originally Posted by [Nikk]

Stupid,

In the first post:



meabe you can read before say something

Maybe you should have done as I said and read the first post... But your to lazy for that so here you go:

Originally Posted by Y_Less

Update 4

Full final 0.3d version. I'm getting fairly smooth at updating things now, which is good! I've also fixed the "Format specifier does not match parameter count" bug. Download source, Linux and Windows plugins here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21683085/sscanf-0.3d.rar

Note that this version is for 0.3d ONLY. I removed the other code as maintaining the code to detect which was the current version was getting inefficient.

[[Nikk]]

Well done, But that is not the first of the post how you say.
Whatever, thanks